Partial search for values by source stopped working in the "Change process field value in fallow from another process field" action_block_status_change_field_by_order_fields

The source is compared by complete coincidence and this is not a bug. Nowhere in the action is it written that you can use %%, you just "hacked" the action and found an extra in it. functionality, congratulations.

[quote] Bodyako Dmitry Employee wrote: The source is compared by complete coincidence and this is not a bug. Nowhere in the action is it written that you can use %%, you just "hacked" the action and found an extra in it. functionality, congratulations. [/quote] I didn’t “hack”, I set a task for Tyndyk 3-5 years ago that he would do it and it worked with all fields (but of course there were a lot of bugs) and until some time in the description it was written that you can use "%%" but then like Masha removed it for some reason, I still don’t understand why Therefore, I ask you to raise the technical specification for these percentages and see what was in the technical specification, only some specific field, or everything should fall under "%%", if it is specific, then ok, if not, then it will be correct PS: I set up this thing "%%" for many people and it worked

Specifically for this block, there is no TK for%, but a partial search does not plow and should not plow in 50% of cases somewhere. On the fields by type of currency, amounts, dimensions, source, etc.

[quote] Bodyako Dmitry Employee wrote: Specifically for this block, there is no TK for%, but a partial search does not plow and should not plow in 50% of cases somewhere. On the fields by type of currency, amounts, dimensions, source, etc. [/quote] As this is not a TK, I set a task, the client seemed to be indicated for this task Alux Here, in any case, you need to find a technical specification to be 100% sure

[quote] Bodyako Dmitry Employee wrote: wait, I don't have time for such things. [/quote] Lady, what the heck I wrote to you that the bug You wrote to me that I hacked the action I'm telling you that this was not a hack, but in reality it was a technical specification for a partial search You say keep it up Well, you approach the issue with humor :) Ok so let it be

I gave you an exact and specific answer, which says that for some of the fields % should not work, what's the problem?

[quote] Bodyako Dmitry Employee wrote: I gave you an exact and specific answer, which says that for some of the fields % should not work, what's the problem? [/quote] no problems :)